|
SEA OTTERS LODGE
Awarded One of South Africa’s Best Accommodation Establishments
NEWS
We thank the Lord our God, family, friends , acquaintances , guests and corporate from all walks of life all over the world for all their well wishes and support during the court case . The support we received were enormous and are highly appreciated.
|
|
Supreme Court of Appeal
Kini Bay Village Association v Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Municipality and others (434/07) Date to be heard: 21 May 2008 Harms JA, Cameron JA, Van Heerden JA, Ponnan JA, Maya, JA Catchwords Administrative law – security for costs– whether decision by 1st respondent to rezone property of 2nd and 3rd respondents constitutes unfair administrative action – whether court a quo misdirected itself in ordering appellant to furnish security for 2nd and 3rd respondents’ costs Appealed from SECLD
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
MEDIA SUMMARY- JUDGMENT DELIVERED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL
From: The Registrar Supreme Court of appeal
Date: 29 May 2008
Status: Immediate
Kini Bay Village Association
And
Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Municipality; Chase Street Properties, Pierre Kolesky
The Supreme Court of Appeal today dismissed an appeal by the Kini Bay Village Association against an order made in the Port Elizabeth High Court directing it to furnish security for costs in its application against Chase Street Properties and Mr Kolesky.
The Supreme Court of Appeal rejected its argument that the judge in the High Court had not properly exercised his discretion by failing to give sufficient regard to the constitutional nature of the relief it sought.
The Supreme Court of Appeal, held that (i) its wealthy members were using it as a front to avoid an adverse costs order and that (ii) even though the litigation bore a constitutional character, principles of equity and fairness dictate that it provides the security to protect the respondents against irrecoverable costs.
Read the full judgment click here |